Fluoridation was first implemented in Ireland after a Constitutional Challenge to the legislation (Ryan v AG) in 1964 was subsequently struck out of the High Court and Supreme Court appeal. However, Justice John Kenny who presided over the challenge ruled malformation of teeth (fluorosis) or any other adverse effect would not be inflicted upon the Irish people as a result of fluoridation1 ,however, the IDA (Irish Dental Association) in 2012 estimated some 40% of the population were suffering from malformation of teeth (fluorosis) as a result of the policy but have failed to advise the Irish Government of this unconstitutional harm (fluorosis) that some 40% of the population continue to suffer from bearing in mind not one scientific or medical authority worldwide have been able to ascertain or determine a margin of error or safety threshold between alleged caries prevention and fluorosis infliction as a result of fluoridation. Ironically, the Irish people's right to bodily integrity was enshrined in enumerated fundamental rights or Article 40.3.1 of Bhunreacht na hEireann as a result of the same legal challenge.
Waterford’s anti fluoride vote comes just three weeks after the USDHHS 2 (United States Department of Health and Human Services) in an unprecedented move in the country where the policy originated from some 70 years ago have publicly recommended reducing the levels of fluoride added to public water supplies by some 50% over concerns of some 41% of US citizens now estimated to suffer from fluorosis. The move means the current levels of between .7mg/l - 1.2mg/l have been reduced to no more then .7mg/l. The Irish Department of Health currently sanction between .6 -.8mg/l of fluoride are added to public water supplies.
The NRC (National Research Council, a prestigious branch of the United States National Academies of Science) Report of 2006 as result of a three year review raised the issue of fluoride induced thyroid disruption and said: “In humans, effects on thyroid function were associated with fluoride exposures of 0.05-0.13 mg/kg/day (4.0 -10.4 mg for a person weighing 80kg) when iodine intake was adequate and 0.01-0.03 mg/kg/day (0.8 - 2.4 mg or approximately 1 - 3.5 litres of water per day for a person weighing 80kg) when iodine intake was inadequate.”
Iodine deficiency is estimated to affect some 33% of the population. The NRC report also classified fluoride as an endocrine disruptor.
In a study that was carried out by researchers from the University of Derby (2013) and the former Health Protection Agency (now part of Public Health England) using 38 everyday tea brands, it was found that persons could be ingesting up to 2mg of fluoride for each serving. The study was published in the peer-reviewed journal Food Research International.
The EU in 2006 also banned hexafluorosilicic acid (fluoride) for use as a biocidal product due to a lack of toxicological data to demonstrate the substance as safe for humans or the environment.
Owen Boyden, director of The National Fluoride Free Towns Project said; “Waterford’s vote of no confidence in the outdated and dangerous policy of medicating without consent the entire Irish population is a very welcome development on this major human rights issue where Councils representing over half the Irish population have since last year called on the Government to scrap enforced compulsory water fluoridation.”
Mr. Boyden also said: “Given recent announcements made by the USDHHS (United States Department of Health and Human Services) because of widespread malformation of teeth to some 41% of US citizens due to fluoridation, I have just last weekend requested a meeting with the Minister for Health, Mr. Leo Varadkar to discuss the matter for which I’ve also sought further additional support from An Taoiseach, Mr. Enda Kenny TD, the Minister for Justice Ms Frances Fitzgerald TD and the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Mr. Simon Coveney TD and considering the systematic violations to human and civil rights the policy continues to incur, I hope the Government will give this matter of urgent national important the inter Departmental attention it deserves and take action to have this matter brought to a prompt and wise conclusion in the near future.”
Sources and References
1 - "I accept the view that the mottling of the teeth of ten per cent of the children in Ireland will not be an indication of fluorosis or of any damage or harm having been done to the children’s teeth by the fluoride ion in the water which they have drunk."
2 - http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2015pres/04/20150427a.html
Supporters of the National Effort include Cork County, Cork City, Kerry, Laois, Dublin City, Wexford, Leitrim, Galway, Cavan, Monaghan and Donegal and Dublin South County Councils representing some 2.5 million Irish Citizens who've all passed motions since earlly 2014 calling on the Government to immediately scrap The Health (fluoridation of water supplies) Act 1960 and bring Ireland's position to this matter in line with EU precedent for which not one other European Government maintain a similar policy due to health, environmental, legal or ethical concerns as a result of ongoing scientific and medical objection.
Incidence levels of dental caries continue to decline across continental Europe irrespectively of whether a country choose public water fluoridation bearing in mind not one scientific or medical authority worldwide in the 70 years of public water fluoridation has been able to ascertain a safety medical margin of error between the alleged "optimal dose" that prevents dental caries and the "over dose" that induces fluorosis.