It all started as a substitute to war, but the substitute has become more terrible in scope, if not in cruelty, than war itself.

Depopulation by consensus allows the continuation of every genetic line, whereas covert depopulation allows the continuation of only a few and self-chosen lineages. Does Pope Francis or his cardinals follow the Golden Rule?  

Do our political leaders live by the Golden Rule? I have personally written to almost each and every one of the world’s nearly 200 heads of state or government and not one of them has chosen to go public with the truth and protect his or her people from genocide. Does UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon or UN Human Rights Commissioner Navanethem Pillay live by the Golden Rule? Letter to UN Human Rights Commissioner Navanethem Pillay

Do the jurists and judges of national supreme courts and international courts live by the Golden Rule? I have filed lawsuits with and sought protection from all three international courts – the European Court of Human Rights, the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights, and the UN Human Rights Council – to denounce the Global Depopulation Policy and to shut down its covert methods peacefully and legally, but not one of them has acknowledged my lawsuits. To the UN Human Rights Committee (HRC): Individual Communication by Kevin Mugur Galalae under the First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Considering the universal decay in moral standards one must ask if those at the very top of the depopulation lobby, our leaders’ leaders, the architects of the Global Depopulation Policy, are actually not justified in murdering mankind so long as people behave like cockroaches and rats rather than like human beings. The silence lives on the fouled air of their universal guilt. How was the world infected with the notion that the majority must be sacrificed to make room for a privileged few?   It was born from the fear that others will develop atomic bombs and the world will be destroyed in a nuclear war unless war is renounced once and for all. That substitute is population control by covert chemical and biological means. To avoid nuclear war, conventional war between nations was renounced and replaced with low-intensity chemical and biological warfare within nations, but directed at human fertility not human life. Japan was the first country to be subjected wholesale and under the cover of secrecy to population control by fluoride and became the guinea pig of the Global Depopulation Policy. 

People will not face this alternative because it is so difficult to abolish war. The abolition of war will demand distasteful limitations of national Sovereignty.

The world’s most eminent scientists, like the military leaders whose bombs they built, kept the knowledge necessary to protect the innocent to themselves and condemned the rest of their fellow human beings to a slow process of annihilation by sterilization and morbidity. There lies before us, if we choose, continual progress in happiness, knowledge, and wisdom. We appeal as human beings to human beings: Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. Resolution

The world’s eminent scientists and in the meantime their lesser colleagues have maintained the code of silence to this day, all the while performing evermore brutal and demented mass experiments on the world’s populace that poison our children, downgrade our genetic lines and shorten the lives of our elderly, while carefully protecting themselves and their own offspring. 

By defying the Golden Rule the world’s scientists have helped create a society of exclusion and a culture of death and are increasingly desperate to justify their creations by misusing science and perverting data, all the while suppressing the lethal truths they have shackled to their immoral agenda of covert depopulation as a substitute to war. If men or nations do evil in a good cause; if they cover themselves with guilt in order to fulfill some high responsibility; or if they sacrifice some high value for the sake of a higher or equal one they make a tragic choice. We have dreamed of a purely rational adjustment of interests in human society; and we are involved in "total" wars. We have dreamed of a "scientific" approach to all human problems; and we find that the tensions of a world-wide conflict release individual and collective emotions not easily brought under rational control. By 1969 the alliance of the technocratic and financial forces behind population control as a substitute to war had built sufficient momentum to penetrate the highest political echelon and to turn the people’s representatives against the people by shutting them out of the future. 

Pure air and water are fundamental to life itself. A growing population will increase the demand for such resources. How will we provide adequate health care when our population reaches 300 million? Unlike other great public issues in the United States, population lacks the dramatic event—the war, the riot, the calamity—that galvanizes attention and action. There is scarcely a facet of American life that is not involved with the rise and fall of our birth and death rates: the economy, environment, education, health, family life and sexual practices, urban and rural life, governmental effectiveness and political freedoms, religious norms, and secular life styles. Although population change touches all of these areas of our national life and intensifies our problems, such problems will not be solved by demographic means alone. Population policy is no substitute for social, economic, and environmental policy. Consideration of the population issue raises profound questions of what people want, what they need—indeed, what they are for. At some point in the future, the finite earth will not satisfactorily accommodate more human beings—nor will the United States. Our answer is that now is the time to confront the question: “Why more people?” The Memorandum enshrined population control at the heart of America’s foreign policy, which has since pursued the objective of sterilizing a quarter of the developing world’s population and has used USADID and other governmental and non-governmental organizations to achieve it. 

The political class, throughout the western world joined the depopulation lobby in the 1960s, a lobby that already comprised military men since the late 1940s and industrialists and scientists since the early 1950s. Every national administration of every western country since the early 1960s has been complicit in crimes against humanity and genocide, crimes committed in the name of population control, the technocracy’s substitute to war, and in blatant violation of the Golden Rule.   

Demographic policies which are without prejudice to basic human rights and which are deemed appropriate by Governments concerned should be applied in those regions where the rate of population growth or excessive population concentrations are likely to have adverse effects on the environment of the human environment and impede development. By the 1990s national governments the world over and all international organizations have been fully and irrevocably infected by the depopulation virus, whether for reasons of resource scarcity, environmental necessity, international bullying, economic coercion, or old-fashioned fascism.

This being the obvious case, China is the model the world must follow with respect to population control, for China is the only country sufficiently honest and undemocratic to pass the One-Child-Policy. 

The hypocritical methods of covert depopulation chosen by the West have shut down a quarter of their people’s genetic lines, most of them belonging to the poor, while pretending to respect people’s reproductive rights.  

Our children have a right to live. Give the world’s people the facts, the choice and the tools to be able to take responsibility for population control and resource sharing. Stop the structural violence. Stop the global genocide. Stop the secrecy. Stop the lies. Stop the poisons.

… What can we do to bring about a world in which people faithfully follow the Golden Rule?

Institutional inertia and individual egoism stand in the way of transformative change, which requires that everyone gives up their monopolies: doctors their monopoly to heal; priests their monopoly on God, scientists their monopoly on research, lawyers their monopoly on justice, politicians their monopoly on power, industrialists their monopoly on production, and bankers their monopoly on money. 

If the world is to survive humankind must live according to the Golden Rule and in order to do so it must eradicate all monopolies and subsume all personal interests to the common good. 

The common people have been forced and coerced by the elites to sacrifice everything they have, including their reproductive rights, now the common people must force the elites to sacrifice equally. If we are to engineer our future and to exclude no one from the equation of life, then the average man is just as entitled and justified to impose sacrifices on the elites as the elites are to impose sacrifices on the common man.  

Full story

Killing Us Softly: Causes and Consequences of the Global Depopulation Policy is considered by the author to be important in understanding the content of Survival or Extinction. Likewise a second book, Chemical and Biological Depopulation is also considered important to understanding. You can download both as a zipfile here