DIRECT NEWS INPUT SEARCH

 

printable version

Survival or Extinction: Part Thirteen—Involved in Mankind
08 Dec 2014: posted by the editor - Features

Survival or Extinction: Part Thirteen—Involved in Mankind - summary
By Kevin Mugur Galalae
The absence of war must mean more than just peace with poison. The responsibility for the state of the world will shift from the nation state to the individual. A state of anarchy reigned in the world, a war of all against all wherein sovereign states were in continuous conflict.

Since the end of World War I, international anarchy has evolved into international intercourse and conflict has reluctantly given way to cooperation as states agreed to recognize a common superior, the League of Nations. Since the end of World War II, mere international intercourse between nations has evolved into a full-fledged international community whose common goals are pursued through the United Nations. 

By staging the 9/11 attack the architects of the New World Order have awakened the world from indifference and apathy before it is too late and have instilled in nations the will to help solve the world’s dire problems by motivating them against a common enemy, even if that enemy if fictitious. The world’s leaders saw America’s resolve and willingness to sacrifice 3000 of its own people so that 7 billion could be spared the scourge of war.   

To fight this imagined global enemy requires global coordination and collaboration. It requires that the world’s armies and intelligence services come together. It requires, in other words, that the world fulfills the second stage of America’s plan for disarmament, as laid out in its 1961 document “Freedom from War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World”. 

Establishment of a permanent international peace force within the United Nations
The Brahimi Report was commissioned ahead of the upcoming Millennium Summit, which took place 6 – 8 September 2000 and was the largest gathering of world leaders in history up to that time, as nearly every head of state of all 189 UN Member States met to discuss the role of the United Nations in the 21st century and ratified the United Nations Millennium Declaration, which identifies 8 key objectives the world needs to accomplish in the 2st century, the highest on the list being “peace, security and disarmament”. At the Millennium Summit, U.S. President Bill Clinton and Russian President Vladimir Putin delivered a plea for world peace and disarmament, showing the world that Russia and the US make up a united front.(1)

This move was once again preceded by a UN Commission, the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS), and enshrined in international law in the World Summit Outcome Document. 

More importantly, at the World Summit the world’s heads of state reaffirmed their commitment to the Millennium Development Goals, mankind’s most ambitious plan to solve its problems, but that is sadly underpinned by the covert and genocidal methods of the Global Depopulation Policy and by the exclusionary and brutal actions of the globalization effort, the pivotal axis of the New World Order.   

The moves and machinations listed above have been intended to and have partially accomplished two global policy objectives: (1) central control over the militaries of sovereign states under the aegis of the UN, and (2) all out commitment by all nation states to closely cooperate in solving the world’s material, economic and environmental problems before they spell the end of mankind. 

The first global policy objective weakens nationalist elements and thus the war-making capabilities of nations while strengthening the international community by empowering international institutions to settle disputes and maintain the peace, as was envisioned in the 1961 Freedom from War document.  When the identity and integrity of nation states was strong and not beholden to the international community, violence was primarily directed at other nations and war was a recurrent tragedy. Since 1945, nuclear deterrence has made war between nations inconceivable and this has committed the leadership of nearly every nation on earth to be loyal to an international community dedicated to peaceful coexistence. As a result, nation states can now direct violence only towards their own citizens to spare the world the scourge of war. The open violence that nations perpetrated on other nations during war time prior to 1945 because they could not solve their problems internally has since been replaced by the structural violence perpetrated covertly by state authorities against their own citizens so that national problems do not explode externally into war. Were nation states to cease and desist all forms of structural violence committed under the ambit of the Global Depopulation Policy, which is the world’s substitute to war, without addressing the ultimate causes that lead to economic, ethnic, religious, material and environmental stresses, they would trigger a world war. Denying the world our involvement forces our leaders to leave us behind. Should we or our leaders continue to hide behind denial, all the sacrifices the world has made to avoid war will lead to war. 

Boris Yeltsin ceded the presidency to Vladimir Putin, a KGB man, in 2000 so that Russia’s military-industrial complex could continue to closely cooperate and coordinate with America’s military-industrial complex to accomplish the second phase of disarmament laid out in Freedom from War as well as the second phase of the Global Depopulation Policy. Since the process was by no means complete when Putin ended the constitutionally mandated term limits in 2008, making him ineligible for a third consecutive presidential term, it became necessary to install a pseudo-President, Dmitry Medvedev, to keep the seat of the presidency warm for Putin so he could resume in 2012 when he duly announced that he would seek a third, non-consecutive presidential term and is currently serving a six-year term. Global policy makers could not risk an unknown entity as President of Russia, lest the country would fall into the hands of an ultra-nationalist who would not only derail the advancement of global unity but could also plunge the world into war by simply withdrawing Russia’s long-standing collaboration with the architects of the New World Order within the international community. 

Note
Boris Yeltsin ceded the presidency to Vladimir Putin, a KGB man, in 2000 so that Russia’s military-industrial complex could continue to closely cooperate and coordinate with America’s military-industrial complex to accomplish the second phase of disarmament laid out in Freedom from War as well as the second phase of the Global Depopulation Policy.  Since the process was by no means complete when Putin ended the constitutionally mandated term limits in 2008, making him ineligible for a third consecutive presidential term, it became necessary to install a pseudo-President, Dmitry Medvedev, to keep the seat of the presidency warm for Putin so he could resume in 2012 when he duly announced that he would seek a third, non-consecutive presidential term and is currently serving a six-year term.  Global policy makers could not risk an unknown entity as President of Russia, lest the country would fall into the hands of an ultra-nationalist who would not only derail the advancement of global unity but could also plunge the world into war by simply withdrawing Russia’s long-standing collaboration with the architects of the New World Order within the international community.  

 

Full story

Killing Us Softly: Causes and Consequences of the Global Depopulation Policy is considered by the author to be important in understanding the content of Survival or Extinction. Likewise a second book, Chemical and Biological Depopulation is also considered important to understanding. You can download both as a zipfile here 

Tags: Survival or Extinction

Name: Remember me
E-mail: (optional)
Smile:smile wink wassat tongue laughing sad angry crying 
Captcha