Also on this page:
Have your say
The common cause
Quiet Corner
Contributed opinion

Other commentary

WHAT YOU SAY

POLL

Advanced Poll

What should happen with Northern Ireland? Become independent Rejoin the Republic of Ireland Continue with Assembly Results More polls

Like to discuss this or any other issue further? Click the link below

VOTE
on a range of other matters

EDITORIAL COMMENT

when this website has something to say it is said here

IMF - They Call It Democracy

---

---

 

Israel
How dare you, Israel government, have the totally reprehensible gutless audacity to refute independently sourced and researched accusations of genocide made against Israel as a "classic example of antisemitism" and "Holocaust inversion", amongst other equally absurd denials.

Playing the antisemitism card no longer works.

You are now recording in history your very own despicable behaviour for future generations to behold.

---

Oldest intelligent homo sapien remains found in Ireland

Kerry farmer apologises for horrific ‘mix-up’

Elmo Maheeny has been replaced by Rumpold Slitskin

What a Load of Trash—self-generating trash research report

Our world today

Of Cannabis Freedom and Dictators

Börhd Hooligan goes ballistic

Reporters Without Borders - Freedom of Information

Crippling the Killing Machine —Hermit Empeysex on war

Contribute news direct to this website

Poll results say 'No-DSS' advertising 'unlawful and discriminatory'

Newsmedianews features index

The basement Years mp3 collection

A Question of Education? Perhaps—but whose? - Hermit Empeysex reports

An examination of Britain's ''improved' state welfare system

Lord Knoxborough still missing

Vote on a range of current and other issues

An encounter with the UK D-Notice-archived yarn

News from the European Union

Newsmedianews forum

Editorial

Our Muppet Democracies - Hermit Empeysex

Exclusive - the Toise Collection

 Tweet

Share

 

Contributed opinion items appear below

OMG, War Is Kind of Horrible       printable version

14 Mar 2022: posted by the editor - Features, International

By David Swanson For decades, the U.S. public seemed largely indifferent to most of the horrible suffering of war. The corporate media outlets mostly avoided it, made war look like a video game, occasionally mentioned suffering U.S. troops, and once in a blue moon touched on the deaths of a handful of local civilians as if their killing were some sort of aberration. The U.S. public funded and either cheered for or tolerated years and years of bloody wars, and came out managing to believe falsely that a large percentage of war deaths are of troops, that a large percentage of war deaths in U.S. wars are U.S. troops, that wars happen in a mysterious place called a "battlefield," and that with rare exceptions the people killed by U.S. troops are people who need killing exactly like those given death sentences in U.S. courts (except for the ones later exonerated). For decades, wise and strategic peace advocates counseled against bothering to mention the millions of men, women, and children slaughtered, wounded, made homeless, terrified, traumatized, poisoned, or starved by U.S. wars. Nobody would care about them, we were told, so mentioning them wouldn't actually help them. It would be smarter to mention only U.S. troops, even if it perpetuated the false belief that the wars were not one-sided genocidal slaughters. It would be even smarter, we were told, to focus on the financial costs of the wars, even though the U.S. government simply invents how ever much money it wants for more wars. Money, we were told, is something that people can care about. Of course, the obvious problem wasn't what we talked about, but that we weren't allowed on television. Of course, the average U.S. resident is not a heartless sociopath. Of course, people care all the time about distant and different human beings. When hurricane victims are presented in the media as worthy, people donate. When a famine is blamed on nature, the money gushes forth. When cancer is depicted as arising from a pristine, unsullied environment, I just dare you to find a neighborhood that won't run a marathon to cure it. So, in theory, I always believed that people in the United States could in fact care about war victims. Just as they could declare "We Are All French" when a bomb went off in France, they could in theory declare "We Are All Yemeni" when the U.S. and Saudi militaries terrorize Yemeni children, or announce "We Are All Afghans" when Joe Biden steals billions of dollars needed for basic survival. You'll have spotted the actual problem, of course. There's no such thing as being terrorized by the U.S. military or a U.S. president stealing from foreigners. Just about nobody, in fact, even knows what colors the Yemeni flag is - much less have they pasted them up everywhere. In the U.S. media those things do not exist. But caring about war victims does exist. I distinctly remember how much people cared about fictional infants removed from incubators to get the first gulf war going, or the impact had by videos of individual victims of ISIS. "Rwanda" was a nonsensical argument for a war on Libya precisely because people are understood to care about war victims when needed to. Syrians have been worthy war victims when the wrong side has been falsely accused of using the wrong kind of weapon. Caring about war victims was always a possibility, and now it has burst forth onto central stage. We now see, directed toward Ukrainians, the concern and empathy that were always possible for little children and grandmothers murdered by war in Iraq or dozens of other countries. For those of us whose opposition to war was always principally driven by concern for its direct victims - augmented by concern for the victims of diverting so many resources into war instead of into useful things - this is an opportunity to speak honestly. Speaking honestly is always more persuasive than speaking manipulatively. Unless you've decided to cheer for Russian mass-murder, here is a chance to say to the media-consuming public: YES! YES! We are with you! War is horrendous! War is immoral! There is nothing worse than war! We must abolish this barbarism! We must abolish it no matter who does it or why. And we'll only do that if we learn the power of nonviolent action to resist it. Millions of Russians and non-Russians believe that Russia is acting defensively and that whatever it does is justified. Millions of Ukrainians and non-Ukrainians believe that whatever it does is defensive and justified. The arguments are wildly different, and we need not dignify the idiocy of objecting to equating them. There is nothing equal or even measurable about human actions. But Russia had nonviolent alternatives to resist NATO expansion and chose violence. Ukraine had nonviolent alternatives to resist Russian invasion, and U.S. televisions are not telling us to what extent Ukrainians have in fact chosen, with little support or organization, to attempt them. If we all survive this crisis, the one lesson we need to take away from it is that human beings live under those fantastic streaks of light that television talking heads ooh and aah over. And if those human beings don't seem to matter much, we can just try thinking of them as if they were Ukrainians. Then we can work on comprehending that the enemy is not the people in whose names the bombs fall. The enemy is war. Tags: Ukraine, Yemen, US, Russia, War

Back to headlines comments (0) recommend

>Local comment

Name:	Remember me
E-mail:	(optional)
Captcha

_____________

Previous Page
r

“Who overcomes by force, hath overcome but half his foe.”
John Milton

                                                     Origins of Poverty
When man came on earth he did not live in a society or hierarchy nor was he endowed with poverty. Good health, longevity, natural cheerfulness were his own even as he found himself amidst plenty. Like other species he lived or perished as the external resources permitted but he lived or perished as a group. Only when the society organised itself into a hierarchy, it was possible for one layer to exist while another persisted during times of scarcity. Organised ways of living, knowledge of all descriptions, systems created for comfort etc. interfered with the natural living of MAN in hundreds of ways. With the passing of time these stratifications of society come to stay and even create a psychology by which even the victim takes his victimization for granted. No question arises in his mind. ...

Had not the society organised itself in such a way that segments of it are protected and other segments were defenseless, MAN would have remained as MAN and would not have been bifurcated into poor and rich.

r

Reality Page | Local comment

r

“Man was always destroying things, and beautiful things.
At the time they wouldn’t seem beautiful.
It was only afterwards that men felt pity for the things their hands had destroyed.”
  Walter Macken — The Scorching Wind

Newsmedianews ads

Direct Input Headlines
Israeli Occupied Palestine - UN Vote - 04 Dec 2024 filed by the editor - Opinion
USA Presidential Election 2024 - 06 Nov 2024 filed by the editor - Opinion, United States
Best to date Ireland Olympic team to be welcomed home today - 12 Aug 2024 filed by the editor - Sport, Ireland